Shares of First Republic Bank hit an all-time low raising questions about the ‘ability of the bank to raise fresh capital’

Shares of First Republic Bank hit an all-time low raising questions about the 'ability of the bank to raise fresh capital'

First Republic Bank shares slumped to an all-time low on a report that advisers have lined up potential buyers of new stock as part of a rescue plan for the beleaguered lender.

Advisers will try to persuade big US banks who have already bailed First Republic out once to purchase bonds from the San Francisco-based company at above-market rates for a total loss of a few billion dollars, less than the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. fees associated with any First Republic failure, CNBC reported Wednesday. As part of that plan, the advisers have already lined up possible purchasers for new shares, CNBC said, citing sources it didn’t identify.

First Republic shares slid as much as 41% to a record intraday low Wednesday morning, and were down 18% to $6.68 at 11:58 a.m. They’ve declined 95% this year.

While “regulators do not act based on stock prices” a steep decline “could raise questions on the ability of a bank to raise fresh capital,” TD Cowen analyst Jaret Seiberg said in a note to clients Wednesday. “We believe there will have to be a broader restructuring of First Republic led by the biggest banks, which have deposited $30 billion in the bank.”

A representative for First Republic didn’t respond to a request for comment from Bloomberg News.Play Video

Last month, First Republic staved off a potential collapse after a group of 11 bigger financial firms agreed to park a combined $30 billion in deposits with the lender. JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and Wells Fargo & Co. each contributed $5 billion of uninsured deposits each, while other banks deposited smaller amounts as part of a plan devised along with US regulators.

Any restructuring led by giant US lenders “could still take days or weeks or months as the banks try to understand what value there is in the franchise and what loss they would be willing to absorb,” Seiberg wrote. “These banks have an incentive to deal as the political fallout of the FDIC making them whole on their $30 billion of deposits could be serious.”

(Updates with analyst’s comments starting in fourth paragraph, updates shares in third.)

–With assistance from Matthew Monks and Bre Bradham.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *